<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Abstraction on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</title>
		<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/abstraction/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Abstraction on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:23:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/abstraction/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>A Source Of Over-Abstraction - Or DRY Isn&#39;t Free</title>
				<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-11-05-dry-isnt-free/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:23:52 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-11-05-dry-isnt-free/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&#34;https://riley.thecsillags.com/cult-of-abstraction/&#34;&gt;The Cult Of Abstraction&lt;/a&gt; I railed against the&#xA;over-use of abstraction.  Here, I want to talk about a particular source cause&#xA;of over-abstraction I have seen (and been guilty of).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- more --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Recently, while working with another team here at Spotify, I was&#xA;working through some of their test code using the &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/spotify/helios/blob/master/docs/testing_framework.md&#34;&gt;Helios Testing Framework&lt;/a&gt;,&#xA;and the harness used a surprisingly complicated tree of classes to set&#xA;up the various containers it used.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>The Cult Of Abstraction</title>
				<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-04-10-cult-of-abstraction/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:43:55 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-04-10-cult-of-abstraction/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Given that people can get really touchy on the subject, let me state&#xA;this up front: &lt;strong&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m not saying we should tolerate lousy code&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Over the course of my career, I&amp;rsquo;ve seen something that I will call&#xA;&amp;ldquo;the cult of abstraction.&amp;rdquo;  On the surface, this sounds like a good&#xA;thing, until you need to debug their code.  While on the surface, it&amp;rsquo;s&#xA;all nice and pretty, and uses classic design patterns, when you&#xA;actually want to find out what it does, you discover that:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
