<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Dependency-Injection on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</title>
		<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/dependency-injection/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Dependency-Injection on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:18:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/dependency-injection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Dependency Injection Without A Framework</title>
				<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2015-02-19-dependency-injection/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2015-02-19-dependency-injection/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that most people would agree these days that dependency&#xA;injection is a good thing for many reasons.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;It allows you to decouple concrete classes from each other&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;It makes for a uniform method of object construction&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;It simplifies plumbing&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Makes it easier to make testable classes&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem that I have with it is that, at least in Java, the main&#xA;frameworks for doing it, being Guice and Spring, can sometimes be as&#xA;bad as the problem DI tries to solve.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
