<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Science on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</title>
		<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/science/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Science on about:rileycsillag fka drewcsillag</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:04:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://riley.thecsillags.com/categories/science/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Programming Done Right Follows The Scientific Method</title>
				<link>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-12-23-programming-is-science/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:04:31 -0400</pubDate>
				<guid>https://riley.thecsillags.com/posts/2014-12-23-programming-is-science/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h3 id=&#34;aka-good-programmers-are-doing-real-science&#34;&gt;AKA Good Programmers Are Doing Real Science&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There are a bunch of long-ish winded definitions of the scientific method, but&#xA;I think a reasonable pithy description would be:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Come up with a theory to explain an existing phenomena.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Use that theory to come up with a falsifiable prediction.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Conduct experiments to prove or disprove the truth of the prediction.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Independent parties repeat #3 and reproduce the results.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;!-- more --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now if the experiments at step three or four disprove the truth of the&#xA;prediction, one of a few things can happen:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
